zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
1 comments
1. random+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-08-01 20:07:13
appreciate your work here, but i was genuinely curious about this, not just trolling
replies(1):
>>dang+Lc
◧
2. dang+Lc
[view]
[source]
2025-08-01 21:18:09
>>random+(OP)
I believe you. Sorry for the generic pattern-matchey response!
[go to top]