zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. random+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-01 20:07:13
appreciate your work here, but i was genuinely curious about this, not just trolling
replies(1): >>dang+Lc
2. dang+Lc[view] [source] 2025-08-01 21:18:09
>>random+(OP)
I believe you. Sorry for the generic pattern-matchey response!
[go to top]