zlacker

[parent] [thread] 13 comments
1. vnchr+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-01 17:50:19
GoodParty.org | Multiple Roles | REMOTE (US) | Full-time & Contract | https://goodparty.org

We're on a mission to disrupt the corrupt two-party system by building tools that change the rules—and we need your help. GoodParty.org is not a political party; we're a fully remote, US-based team united around making democracy more accessible, transparent, and fair. If creatively disrupting politics for good sounds like a challenge you're up for, check out the roles we're looking to fill right now:

- Chief Technical Officer • Engineering • Full-time

- Content and Communications Director • Growth • Full-time

- Data Engineer • Engineering • Full-time

- Director of Engineering • Engineering • Full-time

- Growth Marketer • Growth • Full-time

- Political Associate • Politics • Contract

- Product Design Manager • Design • Full-time

- Product Marketing Manager • Growth • Full-time

- Senior Full Stack Engineer • Engineering • Full-time

- Senior Product Manager • Product • Full-time

- Social Media Content Manager • Growth • Full-time

- Staff Full Stack Engineer • Engineering • Full-time

- User Success Manager • Operations • Full-time

Work with us: https://goodparty.org/work-with-us/

replies(5): >>Ranger+X >>gaeb69+pW >>sether+AZ >>tss93+PEq >>aloof8+kbu
2. Ranger+X[view] [source] 2025-08-01 17:54:18
>>vnchr+(OP)
This looks interesting! Is there a way to reach out more directly? (It’s my understanding that regular submission systems as getting pummeled by bots..)
replies(1): >>vnchr+dE
◧◩
3. vnchr+dE[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-01 21:07:38
>>Ranger+X
We’re making sure to look at every application, you should expect a reply. I’ll keep an eye on this thread for issues.

The bot army for remote jobs is very real…

replies(1): >>ekohlw+XKa
4. gaeb69+pW[view] [source] 2025-08-01 23:44:31
>>vnchr+(OP)
I've been following Goodparty for some time. You guys are my dream company. Is there any potential for 0 YoE roles?
replies(1): >>vnchr+wn1
5. sether+AZ[view] [source] 2025-08-02 00:18:16
>>vnchr+(OP)
I think after having learnt about public benefit corporations, any company that now tells me "they have a mission" is giving me a false bag of goods because now I know there is this legal instrument to codify your mission into your profit motives.

Very cool.

◧◩
6. vnchr+wn1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-02 06:41:44
>>gaeb69+pW
I suggest keeping an eye out. We have regular internships and positions for those out of college. For eng, we’re backfilling right now with a focus on seniors. But our general need is for contributors who can work with our stack. Our code is all public. AI code generation and skill with the frameworks we need is our general trajectory.
replies(1): >>gaeb69+Mg5
◧◩◪
7. gaeb69+Mg5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-03 22:10:59
>>vnchr+wn1
That's exactly what I was hoping to hear. Thank you for clarifying for me!
◧◩◪
8. ekohlw+XKa[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-05 17:37:56
>>vnchr+dE
I applied last month and still haven't heard back. Any idea how long it will take to sort through the pile?
replies(1): >>vnchr+kSk
◧◩◪◨
9. vnchr+kSk[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-08 18:42:28
>>ekohlw+XKa
I'm surprised that's the case, I'll ask hiring team to take a look based on your username. If it's the same username on github, then that'll help. Sorry that happened.
replies(1): >>vnchr+ZJp
◧◩◪◨⬒
10. vnchr+ZJp[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-10 22:45:33
>>vnchr+kSk
Hiring folks said they sent an email, maybe it went to spam folder?
replies(1): >>Danny2+SiZ
11. tss93+PEq[view] [source] 2025-08-11 09:55:21
>>vnchr+(OP)
Do you sponsor visa or allow working from Lisbon (Portugal)? about me: PM, 14y exp., 25mil. ARR from zero
replies(1): >>vnchr+Zjx
12. aloof8+kbu[view] [source] 2025-08-12 13:37:32
>>vnchr+(OP)
I have been wondering how much other tools like NGP treat engineering as opportunity vs offshore cost center. Do you have any sense if other groups are also building out a strong engineering culture?
◧◩
13. vnchr+Zjx[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-13 13:22:14
>>tss93+PEq
I’m sorry, we don’t currently have the ability to support that.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
14. Danny2+SiZ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-23 13:01:50
>>vnchr+ZJp
maybe...
[go to top]