zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. wongar+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-29 14:39:00
Yes, in a perfect world the downsides are limited. But in the world we live in I predict a lot more leaks similar to the Tea app hack (which contained a lot of passports, linked to some quite private data from chats like medical documents)

The biggest hope I see is that the EU also wants to implement age restrictions, but with a lot more effort to get it right and make it compatible with a strong desire for privacy. Maybe that will make "proper" implementations easy and common enough that many of the downsides will be mitigated

replies(1): >>reliab+Qf
2. reliab+Qf[view] [source] 2025-07-29 16:00:24
>>wongar+(OP)
Leaks of what? The tea app are morons — they literally stored the data! Why did they do it? Why not to delete immediately after verification?

Anyway, there are two questions here:

1. Do we need to verify the age of internet users?

2. How can we do it without sacrificing privacy of everyone involved?

replies(1): >>ta1243+HZ
◧◩
3. ta1243+HZ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-29 20:21:48
>>reliab+Qf
> Why did they do it?

You can't monetise the data you don't store

replies(1): >>reliab+601
◧◩◪
4. reliab+601[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-29 20:24:35
>>ta1243+HZ
How can you monetize pictures of IDs?
replies(1): >>ta1243+1a2
◧◩◪◨
5. ta1243+1a2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-30 09:23:34
>>reliab+601
Not sure yet, hence we'll keep it for when we figure that out
[go to top]