zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. alexti+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-28 22:20:01
Um, no. Sensible people don't support the far right. The country has lost all sense, so there are fewer sensible people, so the fools who vote for the far right are on the rise.
replies(2): >>Tokume+x3 >>Glitch+GI
◧
2. Tokume+x3[view] [source] 2025-07-28 22:47:01
>>alexti+(OP)
i'm not debating your position. i'm clarifying that the rephrasing did have meaning, and explaining to you what that difference is.

your politics are none of my business.

replies(1): >>alexti+R8
◧◩
3. alexti+R8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-28 23:21:45
>>Tokume+x3
I was the one who did the rephrasing. I was clarifying its meaning for you.
replies(1): >>Tokume+7b
◧◩◪
4. Tokume+7b[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-28 23:36:00
>>alexti+R8
that's hilarious. well I've been outed as the knob here.
replies(1): >>alexti+A71
◧
5. Glitch+GI[view] [source] 2025-07-29 04:56:13
>>alexti+(OP)
After rereading it with the sibling comment in mind, the swap does make sense in that it subtly shifts the implied causality of the surge in far right polling. My bad for misunderstanding, thanks for the clarifications!
◧◩◪◨
6. alexti+A71[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-29 08:42:08
>>Tokume+7b
I'm laughing too. Thanks for that.

In all honesty, I thought I was being clever by swapping the sentences around to reverse the meaning, but I didn't spot the ambiguity.

[go to top]