zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. johnis+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-28 17:00:28
What about the "obviously not a kid" types? Please tell me you can at the very least estimate.
replies(1): >>Mister+2h
2. Mister+2h[view] [source] 2025-07-28 18:38:22
>>johnis+(OP)
> What about the "obviously not a kid" types?

In my high school drivers ed there was a kid who looked like he was in his 20's with a full thick beard, stocky muscular build, deep voice. I thought he got left back a bunch but turns out he was my age - 16. So "obviously not a kid" doesn't really work and potentially puts people at risk.

replies(1): >>johnis+Ao5
◧◩
3. johnis+Ao5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-30 12:47:37
>>Mister+2h
So how do you guys verify it without any documents? Bones style?
[go to top]