zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. thfura+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-26 15:25:17
No, the difference between value and perceived value was pretty much their point.
replies(1): >>charci+GE
2. charci+GE[view] [source] 2025-07-26 22:11:12
>>thfura+(OP)
I see perceived values as more of a multiplier. If an app had 0 value, 0 times anything is still 0. You can't take hostages over something with no value. If people didn't value their life it wouldn't work, similarly if people saw 0 value in an app they wouldn't use it.
replies(1): >>johnny+8Q
◧◩
3. johnny+8Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-27 00:49:50
>>charci+GE
My argument was about how value is decreasing. No one is arguing that these websites have zero value to begin with.

A more interesting thought experiment is where that threshold is before the lack of value invigorates the energy needed to migrate. That's part of why I put the boiling frog metaphor there. Rate of change definitely has impact on perceived value.

[go to top]