zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. akdev1+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-26 13:54:24
Most apps on Mac are not on the App Store

You download a DMG file or something, then you drag and drop some icon into your “applications” folder

It is kind of dumb. I haven’t seen any graphical package manage interface to handle this.

replies(2): >>jdiff+o1 >>bratwu+b7
2. jdiff+o1[view] [source] 2025-07-26 14:08:03
>>akdev1+(OP)
The App Store is the graphical package manager interface. Or in the case of apps that haven't published, the Finder/Applications folder itself. It makes a lot of sense, similar to the way GoboLinux stashed packages in its new world filesystem hierarchy. One folder, one package.
replies(1): >>johnis+DD
3. bratwu+b7[view] [source] 2025-07-26 14:51:24
>>akdev1+(OP)
new to mac and when i dis this the first time i was "wtf is this made for children"

but I understand more. Its more a folder oriented system. kind of

replies(1): >>TingPi+Ia
◧◩
4. TingPi+Ia[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 15:20:59
>>bratwu+b7
Its fine, it just has the quirk that sharing folders sucks and you have to put it in a container so it’s a single file.
◧◩
5. johnis+DD[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 20:02:47
>>jdiff+o1
You do not need a new filesystem hierarchy for it. I have a "one folder one package" kind of setup (among others), e.g. packages are at ~/.local/pkg and I have them symlinked from there to ~/.local. It works for many programs. I use "zpkg", but you could use "GNU stow", too.
[go to top]