zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. scarfa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-26 02:03:19
Well seeing that you could play music in the background from Safari since 2007, Spotify is the one forcing you to use an app

Apple makes no money from the Spotify app being on the iPhone and hadn’t for over a decade.

replies(1): >>h4ck_t+86
2. h4ck_t+86[view] [source] 2025-07-26 03:20:09
>>scarfa+(OP)
This is an untrue statement.

Music was played by the iTunes process on mobile until 2016, and only a single audio stream at a time. How dare you wanted a fade in/out with less than 3 seconds latency!

And even then Apple was reluctant to implement a correct Promise based Audio API in WebKit, which in turn was incompatible with all other Web Browsers (up until today, btw) and also had very different audio formats supported that were only compatible with iOS due to proprietary patents.

Saying WebKit played music in 2007 is literally a worse experience than a Flash web player doing that.

replies(1): >>scarfa+Lk
◧◩
3. scarfa+Lk[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 06:49:16
>>h4ck_t+86
It is very true, you think the only way thst music came from your phone before 2016 was iTunes? It was a hack that streaming services - mostly radio streaming services- used before iOS 4 when apps could play music in the background used because Safari was the only thing that could run in the background.

The question was why did Spotify have to use an app instead of using the web.

But then again, are you really saying that Android users don’t use the app?

[go to top]