zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Brian_+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-26 01:18:17
"clock in well under the 100MB mark"

But this is still incredibly ridiculously comically gross. The fact that we can afford it these days is an irrelevant seperate thing. These numbers are just unjustifiable for what most apps actually do.

replies(2): >>johnis+x >>cosmic+r1
2. johnis+x[view] [source] 2025-07-26 01:23:45
>>Brian_+(OP)
Yeah, especially if I can make a desktop app under 10 MB with the same functionality and features (obviously non-Electron).
3. cosmic+r1[view] [source] 2025-07-26 01:36:30
>>Brian_+(OP)
I mean, it scales with complexity. Naturally, well-made native SDK apps bumping up against 100MB are more likely to be highly functional, while simple apps are very small.

For a couple examples pulled from my TestFlight list, there’s a social media site reader app that’s 7.6MB and a text editor that’s 697KB. Those sizes aren’t the least bit unreasonable.

replies(1): >>tomrod+Ea
◧◩
4. tomrod+Ea[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 03:31:21
>>cosmic+r1
What are these you are listing?
[go to top]