zlacker

[parent] [thread] 9 comments
1. charci+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-26 01:02:04
How about the value of being able to talk to people who share the same hobby you do. Or the value of being able to see a community made wiki about some topic you are trying to learn about. Even being able to see cat pictures is valuable to people.
replies(4): >>thfura+45 >>c-hend+c5 >>datadr+r5 >>II2II+T8
2. thfura+45[view] [source] 2025-07-26 02:03:10
>>charci+(OP)
You can do that on the website.
replies(1): >>charci+pd
3. c-hend+c5[view] [source] 2025-07-26 02:03:55
>>charci+(OP)
None of that is unique to the app though, and existed before the app.
replies(1): >>dylan6+2c
4. datadr+r5[view] [source] 2025-07-26 02:07:52
>>charci+(OP)
We should be able to get that value in a fair way without giving up massive amounts of information in sketchy ways.
5. II2II+T8[view] [source] 2025-07-26 02:52:21
>>charci+(OP)
I tend to use Reddit on mobile as a read-only medium, but I don't see why one couldn't contribute to conversations/wikis with a mobile browser. One can certainly do so through their website with a desktop browser. If there is a barrier, it would be artificial.

It's also worth noting that I have nothing against apps. I use them to read RSS feeds, download podcasts, etc.. Yet those are independent of any particular service and there is enough choice between apps that I can use one that respects my privacy. I am not being limited in any way. If anything, it is more empowering since the developers of a dedicated RSS feed reader is more likely to design an app that is directed towards the needs of its users. In contrast, the Reddit app is directed towards the needs of Reddit.

◧◩
6. dylan6+2c[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 03:32:57
>>c-hend+c5
Nothing existed before a user was born. It is impossible for someone that has always had something to imagine in a real manner what not having it would be like. Hell, if there's an AWS outage for a couple of hours, those that have always had it freak out like the world is ending.
◧◩
7. charci+pd[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 03:54:46
>>thfura+45
I never claimed it doesn't.
replies(1): >>thfura+tF
◧◩◪
8. thfura+tF[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 10:19:17
>>charci+pd
Then what was your claim?
replies(1): >>charci+JN1
◧◩◪◨
9. charci+JN1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-26 22:02:51
>>thfura+tF
That the mobile app is providing value to people. So companies paying to make the app are also providing value to people.
replies(1): >>dylan6+il3
◧◩◪◨⬒
10. dylan6+il3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-27 18:00:53
>>charci+JN1
if the website already provides the value, there is no need for the app. instead, they cripple the website to push people to the app. why? it is more profitable for the company because of the data they can get from the app. doesn't matter if the UX is worse for the user. they only need to make it just usable enough
[go to top]