zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. colin_+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-25 00:23:56
Intel is not funded by venture capital.
replies(2): >>jerryg+B >>selimt+H
2. jerryg+B[view] [source] 2025-07-25 00:29:46
>>colin_+(OP)
You could remove venture and it would still be accurate
replies(1): >>colin_+n2
3. selimt+H[view] [source] 2025-07-25 00:30:33
>>colin_+(OP)
The new fabs were funded by PE.
replies(2): >>colin_+a2 >>Beetle+En
◧◩
4. colin_+a2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 00:42:02
>>selimt+H
PE is not VC. VC is targeted at early-stage companies, which Intel is not.
replies(2): >>bnop+43 >>sidewn+8k
◧◩
5. colin_+n2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 00:43:11
>>jerryg+B
Sorry, but I don’t find it a very insightful comment.

(Removed comment about it being AI-generated since that might be unfair.)

replies(1): >>bnop+Z2
◧◩◪
6. bnop+Z2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 00:47:34
>>colin_+n2
Its not AI generated. Sorry friend. Even if it was, assess the message, not the medium :)
◧◩◪
7. bnop+43[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 00:48:12
>>colin_+a2
Replace VC with shareholders - the point is the same. Someone wants more money out than in. That same someone doesn’t have long-term incentive to care about our future, or even the customer

To achieve that, business owners do as I mentioned and more. Not out of maliciousness or spite, but out of necessity

◧◩◪
8. sidewn+8k[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 03:21:17
>>colin_+a2
Depending on the PE firm, it could make the worst VC look like an angel
◧◩
9. Beetle+En[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 03:58:37
>>selimt+H
Not really. Intel made an agreement with a PE firm while well into building the fabs. In terms of the overall capital spent, most of it is Intel's.
[go to top]