zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. dom96+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-24 22:25:24
If there is no fundamental difference, then why aren't there more x86 mobile phones out there?
replies(3): >>tester+o8 >>wmf+F8 >>Panzer+Df
2. tester+o8[view] [source] 2025-07-24 23:24:56
>>dom96+(OP)
x86, ARM, etc. are huge ecosystems and things are orders of magnitudes more complex than we use those letters vs you use these letters for ISA.

The answer for your question can be: because somebody didn't put enough effort / attention to make it work

Is it true? I dont know, but can be

3. wmf+F8[view] [source] 2025-07-24 23:27:01
>>dom96+(OP)
Probably no one will believe this but it's just because Intel didn't put much effort into the phone Atom chips. They could have been really good.
replies(1): >>astran+wg
4. Panzer+Df[view] [source] 2025-07-25 00:27:58
>>dom96+(OP)
Fundamental difference when it comes to performance.

In terms of implementations, obviously arch matters a lot in terms of the "established" software ecosystems, but if you're writing some software and need to hit a performance target no arch has a particular advantage solely because of its architectural implementation.

◧◩
5. astran+wg[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 00:34:33
>>wmf+F8
They're also not that different because the latest x86 extension turns it into arm64.

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/t...

[go to top]