zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. jiggaw+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-24 21:39:41
I consult for large bureaucracies where this kind of thing is occasionally enforced.

There’s nothing more fun than a carefully thought out cohesive design that takes into account all business and technical constraints being randomly “improved” by a too-busy senior manager who’s been “off the tools” for decades.

“You should switch to NoSQL.” — a nearly verbatim quote from a meeting just last week. No justification or elaboration, just… abandon a relational database platform with two decades of built up business value on a whim.

“Rejoice! For you have been managed!”

replies(1): >>mattke+5b
2. mattke+5b[view] [source] 2025-07-24 22:49:10
>>jiggaw+(OP)
I used to work for a chief exec like that. They’d see something on someone’s screen and demand changes, destroying months of carefully planned work with a single comment.

In the end, we’d build in ‘breakpoints’ - things that we knew they’d pick up on and want to change so they felt like they’d had some input without damaging anything important. This worked very well.

replies(1): >>wnevet+ff
◧◩
3. wnevet+ff[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-24 23:18:43
>>mattke+5b
Just remove the duck
[go to top]