zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. Insani+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-07-24 21:23:10
If one would be skeptical about leadership, one might assume that this is a forcing function for people to quit ahead of the layoffs.. :)
replies(1):
>>IshKeb+o1
◧
2. IshKeb+o1
[view]
[source]
2025-07-24 21:30:18
>>Insani+(OP)
Yeah make the best people who can easily get a job elsewhere quit. Great strategy Intel.
replies(2):
>>tayo42+54
>>electr+MH
◧◩
3. tayo42+54
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-07-24 21:43:13
>>IshKeb+o1
What companies are you all going to then?
There's like 10 that pay alot, actually hiring, and have remote work available.
replies(2):
>>__s+6f
>>bdangu+3I
◧◩◪
4. __s+6f
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-07-24 22:54:07
>>tayo42+54
If you're good, the people you've worked with who've left before will make headcount for you where they are now
◧◩
5. electr+MH
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-07-25 02:54:35
>>IshKeb+o1
100% It isn’t just Intel though. A large number of Fortune 500 and government are using this same tactic with the same flaw.
◧◩◪
6. bdangu+3I
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-07-25 02:56:53
>>tayo42+54
craziest thing by far on HN echochamber is exactly this - you gotta slave at “faaaaang” to make a living… so wild!
[go to top]