zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. wlesie+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-18 15:51:20
Getting access to Medicaid data for public health research is a giant pain in the ass with layers upon layers of red tape and IRBs and training about how you are allowed to handle it.
replies(2): >>fnordp+1a >>noneth+hs
2. fnordp+1a[view] [source] 2025-07-18 16:38:43
>>wlesie+(OP)
Only if it’s done in compliance. There was been little to show this administration follows the constitution, laws, or judicial orders let alone regulation. Especially when it comes to Stephen Miller there’s a significant “move fast and break the law” effort knowing judicial or legislative remedy can take a long time and is not assured given the penetration of captured justices and congressional independence. Especially in something like this where you have to establish standing, do discovery, etc, it’s an uphill battle to ensure compliance and the out of compliance stuff happens behind closed doors. With most of the federal government oversight functions either gutted or entirely captured by politically partisan sycophants, I would not hold my breath expecting any boundaries or relief.

This is what a real deep state looks like. “He who smelt it dealt it” seems to be a natural law.

replies(1): >>wlesie+bh
◧◩
3. wlesie+bh[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-18 17:08:10
>>fnordp+1a
Yes, I am assuming that ICE is not being held to the same (or any) standards and this is a real heap of bullshit
4. noneth+hs[view] [source] 2025-07-18 18:00:55
>>wlesie+(OP)
>Getting access to Medicaid data for public health research is a giant pain in the ass with layers upon layers of red tape and IRBs and training about how you are allowed to handle it.

Can you contextualize this comment? Are you saying it shouldnt be so difficult? Or that the government should have to jump through the same hoops? Or?

replies(1): >>wlesie+eR
◧◩
5. wlesie+eR[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-18 20:27:26
>>noneth+hs
See previous reply to sibling comment
[go to top]