zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. GRiMe2+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-17 11:39:41
Every time I see messages and posts like this, I hope that big companies were being dissatisfied with the product factory scaling issue and device sell effectiveness.

I hope that small companies would launch device like this with 500-1000 devices being created and sold in a year just fulfill the niche and doesn't go bankrupt

replies(1): >>kayode+D7
2. kayode+D7[view] [source] 2025-07-17 12:39:10
>>GRiMe2+(OP)
I don’t think you could manufacture a small run like that without the price being extremely high.

Say you charge $1,000 per device. That means you need to build an entire company, pay staff, and prototype then manufacture a custom hardware device with customized software with less than a million dollars. Costs add up real fast.

replies(1): >>alabhy+Fb
◧◩
3. alabhy+Fb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-17 13:03:48
>>kayode+D7
Why does the cost need to be so high? Chinese markets have many small phone options like Soyes and Servo that cost less than $100. Unfortunately, these devices are potentially loaded with malware.

Can a similar device without malware not be made in small batches? At a selling price of $500 or less?

replies(2): >>coldpi+Dd >>kayode+Eo1
◧◩◪
4. coldpi+Dd[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-17 13:13:22
>>alabhy+Fb
I actually had a brief email conversation with the folks running the project in the OP. Basically they said they can't get a reasonable-quality screen in that size. No one makes it. They would have to spin up a whole new manufacturing line for a quality, small screen and the cost on that is insane. The screens on the small phones you're talking about are very low quality.
◧◩◪
5. kayode+Eo1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-17 20:03:30
>>alabhy+Fb
I’m pretty sure a manufacturer can cobble something together from existing parts or even white label a phone for you.

The end result will be a $100 quality phone.

[go to top]