zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. keyrin+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-17 09:40:20
FM radio uses the headphone cable as an antenna, so with the move to bluetooth I assume it got squashed for similar reasons. The other aspect is it assumes if you want live radio that you're happy needing an active data connection and allowance, any any local stations have a stream available. One of the things I love about streaming (via RadioDroid, etc) is that you can get a station from anywhere on the planet but sometimes you want something a bit more basic.
replies(2): >>fsflov+fA >>tomwhe+af1
2. fsflov+fA[view] [source] 2025-07-17 14:16:59
>>keyrin+(OP)
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-hidde...
3. tomwhe+af1[view] [source] 2025-07-17 18:08:00
>>keyrin+(OP)
> FM radio uses the headphone cable as an antenna, so with the move to bluetooth I assume it got squashed for similar reasons.

Some may prefer Bluetooth headphones, and there are countless apologists who now retroactively parrot the manufacturers' excuses for why headphone jacks were eliminated, but it wasn't something the _users_ asked for or wanted.

"Oh, but phones are waterproof now," they claim! Well, so was the Samsung Galaxy S5 I bought in 2014. And by the way, it also had a user-removable battery, removable storage, an FM radio, and an IR blaster. All these years later, you can't find a new phone with all of those features and it's very difficult to find a flagship phone with even _one_ of them.

[go to top]