zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. makeit+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-17 03:03:13
> very small Android phones

IMHO this is just not viable in the current world.

I agree with line the article sets (5"4 for 1080p, almost the size of the Pixel 4a), as mainstream apps will properly work at that size. I still have a working 4a, and some banking apps are getting pretty cramped for instance. And many websites already need furious panning and zooming.

A credit card size phone would only work for people who basically hate their phones I think.

replies(3): >>ChrisM+j >>happym+Qa >>ghaff+LF
2. ChrisM+j[view] [source] 2025-07-17 03:08:10
>>makeit+(OP)
I agree. I think the article about them was on Ars Technica, but I don’t really feel like looking for it.

They seemed underwhelmed at the phones.

[EDITED TO ADD]

Found ‘em: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/10/palm-rises-from-the-...

Also, these: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/11/meet-this-unique-com...

replies(1): >>ChrisM+eA
3. happym+Qa[view] [source] 2025-07-17 05:25:31
>>makeit+(OP)
> banking apps are getting pretty cramped

Completely agree. Although not even on "small phones", my S23 isn't small but the design of these apps has regressed so much that I barely see any useful information.

On my old WAP phone I could see bank balance and maybe the last transaction or two. Now half the screens taken up with upselling account levels, invest in shares, buy crypto, you've been pre-approved!

replies(1): >>zo1+Yg1
◧◩
4. ChrisM+eA[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-17 09:54:32
>>ChrisM+j
And this was their review of it: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/12/palm-phone-review-fu...
5. ghaff+LF[view] [source] 2025-07-17 10:59:14
>>makeit+(OP)
>A credit card size phone would only work for people who basically hate their phones I think.

Probably. It's people who know they have to own a smartphone for so many things like park their car but don't really want one.

This was a number of years back but I know a then tech executive who got a phone (I think it may have been a feature phone at the time) only because their nanny absolutely insisted.

◧◩
6. zo1+Yg1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-17 15:04:27
>>happym+Qa
It's the padding! And the UX teams that add them into the designs!

My cynical take is that an unholy pact was formed between FE devs and UX designers:

By adding in "design" and "user experience" you essentially reduce features, complexity and general "dev time" of every single user-screen or page or component. They're no longer cram-packed with oodles of features, toggles, buttons, menus, etc. Most pages are glorified lists of things, with maybe a menu on each item if you are lucky. Devs dev less, have less bugs, just use FE-library of the day and go home happy because they made a CRUD screen essentially.

Meanwhile, UX designers get to play around and constantly fiddle with design because let's all be honest, nothing will ever be truly good and in a perfect "user experience" space because complexity and functionality are never what the user is happy about having, until they need it.

[go to top]