zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. card_z+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-10 20:26:20
I saw that edit. Indeed you can't predict that rejecting a new thing is part of a routine of being wrong. It's true that "it's strange and new, therefore I hate it" is a very human (and adorable) instinct, but sometimes it's reasonable.
replies(2): >>jstumm+a6 >>saturn+st1
2. jstumm+a6[view] [source] 2025-07-10 21:00:48
>>card_z+(OP)
"I saw that edit" lol
replies(1): >>card_z+07
◧◩
3. card_z+07[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-10 21:05:54
>>jstumm+a6
Sorry, just happened to. Slightly rude of me.
replies(1): >>jstumm+H8
◧◩◪
4. jstumm+H8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-10 21:16:58
>>card_z+07
Ah, you do you. It's just a fairly kindergarten thing to point out and not something I was actively trying to hide. Whatever it was.

Generally, I do a couple of edits for clarity after posting and reading again. Sometimes that involves removing something that I feel could have been said better. If it does not work, I will just delete the comment. Whatever it was must not have been a super huge deal (to me).

replies(1): >>maxbon+zI
◧◩◪◨
5. maxbon+zI[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-11 02:38:36
>>jstumm+H8
FYI there's a "delay" setting in your profile that allows you to make your comment invisible for up to ten minutes.
6. saturn+st1[view] [source] 2025-07-11 11:16:21
>>card_z+(OP)
It is an even more human reaction when the new strange thing directly threatens to upend and massively change the industry that puts food on your table.

The steam-powered loom was not good for the luddites either. Good for society at large in the long term but all the negative points that a 40 year old knitter in 1810 could make against the steam-powered loom would have been perfectly reasonable and accurate judged on that individual's perspective.

[go to top]