zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. gojomo+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-10 19:07:12
Did each developer do a large enough mix of AI/non-AI tasks, in varying orders, that you have any hints in your data whether the "AI penalty" grew or shrunk over time?
replies(1): >>narush+P
2. narush+P[view] [source] 2025-07-10 19:12:02
>>gojomo+(OP)
You can see this analysis in the factor analysis of "Below-average use of AI tools" (C.2.7) in the paper [1], which we mark as an unclear effect.

TLDR: over the first 8 issues, developers do not appear to get majorly less slowed down.

[1] https://metr.org/Early_2025_AI_Experienced_OS_Devs_Study.pdf

replies(1): >>gojomo+Ue
◧◩
3. gojomo+Ue[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-10 20:39:49
>>narush+P
Thanks, that's great!

But: if all developers did 136 AI-assisted issues, why only analyze excluding the 1st 8, rather than, say, the first 68 (half)?

replies(1): >>narush+bn
◧◩◪
4. narush+bn[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-10 21:30:56
>>gojomo+Ue
Sorry, this is the first 8 issues per-developer!
[go to top]