zlacker

You're assuming discrimination on the basis of groups. That seems bad to me.

Laws and their enforcement are a clusterfuck. To achieve greater justice we should strive towards better judgements overall.

God, stop with the group on group bs please and engage with things the way they're written without injecting the entirety of your cynical worldview layered on top.

>>rockem+(OP)
I don't assume discrimination on the basis of group affiliation. I give it as an example of why it is much more important that the law is applied consistently than that it is sound.

Furthermore, group affiliation based differences in judicial decisions are very common, both when it comes to ethnic origin, wealth and profession.

In this case group affiliation is also directly relevant: individuals who have infringed copyright are typically not treated in the way that these firms that have infringed copyright are. The group affiliation in question is thus 'are you an employer/wealth person owning part of a large firm' vs 'a normal, non-employer/non-wealthy person'.