zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. rexpop+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-03 16:06:10
> Consider the framing, you ask. I considered it and reject it

Thank you for taking the time. I won't argue with your point that Islamist nations are, on the whole, far more brutal than Israel has yet had a chance to be. There is no Judaic Daesh, for example, and none of the well-documented atrocities of the IDF come close.

> sounds like a manifesto from the lawns of a university activist encampment

I'm a technology professional without a university degree, only a passion for my craft and a pride in my handiwork. I happen to be a Torah scholar, as well, and it's through that lens I condemn Israel's complicity in the maintainance of the international caste system.

On the other hand, what choice do they have? To make an enemy of capital, with no allies?

Israel is a bit of a kapo. But at least it's not a Saud.

replies(1): >>runarb+N4
2. runarb+N4[view] [source] 2025-07-03 16:33:23
>>rexpop+(OP)
> There is no Judaic Daesh, for example, and none of the well-documented atrocities of the IDF come close.

Ideologically there is an argument to be had that the most extreme versions of Zionism (e.g. Kahanism) is just as bad as the fundamentalist (and racist) ideology of ISIS. Behaviorally the IDF is far worse then ISIS ever had a chance to be. The total number of atrocities, the impunity of their actions, the systematic nature of them, the backing of the entire state apparatus behind those atrocities, the number of victims, and the concentrated location of those victims makes the IDF far far worse.

Of course it is very silly to compare atrocities, one should try not to do that, as one set of victims deserve justice just as equally as any other set of victims.

[go to top]