zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. Throwa+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-06-25 22:33:02
I'm sure they would have loved to save the hassle and expense of disassembling physical books. Presumably something legal related or cost related prevented them from going that route.
replies(1):
>>JohnFe+T1
◧
2. JohnFe+T1
[view]
[source]
2025-06-25 22:47:24
>>Throwa+(OP)
Yes, they did it as a workaround for copyright. TFA explains that aspect.
replies(1):
>>rpdill+sk
◧◩
3. rpdill+sk
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-06-26 02:14:54
>>JohnFe+T1
It's not a workaround for copyright. It's to obey copyright. As in: copyright law is the reason they destroyed the books.
Meta didn't have to do any of this. They just used The Pile.
[go to top]