zlacker

«XBOW submitted nearly 1,060 vulnerabilities. All findings were fully automated, though our security team reviewed them pre-submission to comply with HackerOne’s policy on automated tools»

That seems a bit unethical. I’ve thought companies specifically deny usage of automated tools. A bit too late ey…?

>>keisbo+(OP)
They acknowledge that in the article and all submissions are human reviewed before they are submitted.

>>8200_u+zb
The policies states it’s not allowed to use automated tools, not to submit report using automated tools alone. Human review does not really change that.

>>keisbo+Yk
if a human reviewer can repro the bug, there is no difference between automated or human found bug.

bug works and is repro - as a software owner, do you care if human or ai found it?

>>slt202+0E
I cannot answer for all the program owners, but I imagine that there are other concerns than reproducibility