zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. vmayor+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-25 06:05:48
It’s humans who:

- Design the system and prompts

- Build and integrate the attack tools

- Guide the decision logic and analysis

This isn’t just semantics — overstating AI capabilities can confuse the public and mislead buyers, especially in high-stakes security contexts.

I say this as someone actively working in this space. I participated in the development of PentestGPT, which helped kickstart this wave of research and investment, and more recently, I’ve been working on Cybersecurity AI (CAI) — the leading open-source project for building autonomous agents for security:

- CAI GitHub: https://github.com/aliasrobotics/cai

- Tech report: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.06017

I’m all for pushing boundaries, but let’s keep the messaging grounded in reality. The future of AI in security is exciting — and we’re just getting started.

replies(1): >>vasco+L3
2. vasco+L3[view] [source] 2025-06-25 06:51:40
>>vmayor+(OP)
> It's humans

Who would it be, gremlins? Those humans weren't at the top of the leaderboard before they had the AI, so clearly it helps.

replies(1): >>vmayor+Ykc
◧◩
3. vmayor+Ykc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-30 10:17:10
>>vasco+L3
Actually, those humans (XBOW's) were already top rankers. Just look it up.

What's being critized here is the hype, which can be misleading and confusing. On this topic, wrote a small essay: “Cybersecurity AI: The Dangerous Gap Between Automation and Autonomy,” to sort fact from fiction -> https://shorturl.at/1ytz7

[go to top]