zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. thinki+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-24 19:35:59
If you charge me to use your program and it spits out unedited, copyrighted material then it should be illegal. I don't know the details of this case, but that's what's going on in the New York Times case. It's not always so cut and dry.
replies(1): >>dmix+Cj
2. dmix+Cj[view] [source] 2025-06-24 21:37:00
>>thinki+(OP)
Which is amusing because NYTimes has fought in court a few times in favour of technology progress over copyright. Including recently when they got sued over collected a bunch of freelance writing into a database without consent. https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2024/04/nyt-v-openai-the-t...

I doubt the exact replica stuff will stand, as technically it was only achievable via advanced prompt engineering (hacking), not simply asking for a replica. So their 2 other arguments boils down to scraping a news database = infringement and LLM output = derivative works.

[go to top]