zlacker

> Their success rate on HackerOne seems widely varying.

Some of that is likely down to company policies; Snapchat's policy, for example, is that nothing is ever marked invalid.

>>thauma+(OP)
Yes, I'm sure anyone with more HackerOne experience can give specifics on the companies' policies. For now, those are the most objective measures of quality we have on the reports.

>>jamess+21
This is discussed in the post – many came down to individual programs' policies e.g. not accepting the vulnerability if it was in a 3rd party product they used (but still hosted by them), duplicates (another researcher reported the same vuln at the same time; not really any way to avoid this), or not accepting some classes of vuln like cache poisoning.