zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. SoKami+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-24 17:09:39
What if I overfit my LLM so it spits out copyrighted work with special prompting? Where to draw the line in training?
replies(2): >>ninety+E4 >>bonobo+OJ
2. ninety+E4[view] [source] 2025-06-24 17:37:58
>>SoKami+(OP)
I mean the human brain can memorize things as well and it’s not illegal. It’s only illegal if said memorized thing is distributed.
replies(3): >>mrguyo+9g >>martin+5F >>tartor+pL
◧◩
3. mrguyo+9g[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-24 18:42:57
>>ninety+E4
Because humans have rights

AI models do not.

replies(2): >>NoOn3+5J >>ninety+2R1
◧◩
4. martin+5F[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-24 20:55:35
>>ninety+E4
Humans don't scale. LLMs do.

Even if LLMs were actual human-level AI (they are not - by far), a small bunch of rich people could use them to make enormous amounts of money without putting in the enormous amounts of work humans would have to.

All the while "training" (= precomputing transformations which among other things make plagiarism detection difficult) on work which took enormous amounts of human labor without compensating those workers.

◧◩◪
5. NoOn3+5J[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-24 21:21:53
>>mrguyo+9g
Exactly. If someone wants to compare AI models with humans, maybe then they give AI Models the right to vote and other rights.
6. bonobo+OJ[view] [source] 2025-06-24 21:26:12
>>SoKami+(OP)
If you do something else, the result may be something else. The line is drawn by the application of subjective common sense by the judge, just as it is every time.
◧◩
7. tartor+pL[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-24 21:37:14
>>ninety+E4
Humans can only memorize such few texts in comparison so they'd not be scallable in the same sense LLMs are.
◧◩◪
8. ninety+2R1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-25 10:13:05
>>mrguyo+9g
They use to say the same thing about black people.
[go to top]