zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. sidewn+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-24 17:05:19
Wasn't that just over an arrangement of someone else's photographs?
replies(1): >>lesuor+I
2. lesuor+I[view] [source] 2025-06-24 17:09:54
>>sidewn+(OP)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol_Foundation_for_the...

I wouldn't call it that. Goldsmith took a photograph of Prince which Warhol used as a reference to generate an illustration. Vanity Fair then chose to buy a license Warhol's print instead of Goldsmith's photograph.

So, despite the artwork being visual transformative (silkscreen vs photograph) the actual use was not transformed.

[go to top]