zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. PunchT+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-24 16:49:25
why would it erase the mistake? you pirated first.
replies(1): >>gbacon+87
2. gbacon+87[view] [source] 2025-06-24 17:33:06
>>PunchT+(OP)
Who is the victim, and how was that person not made whole?
replies(1): >>kccqzy+7U
◧◩
3. kccqzy+7U[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-24 22:22:29
>>gbacon+87
The copyright holder. That person was not made whole because of the time value of money. I stole $1000 from you in January and returned it to you in June: why should you happily give me a zero interest loan?
replies(1): >>gbacon+k91
◧◩◪
4. gbacon+k91[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-25 00:45:37
>>kccqzy+7U
No royalty contract is getting an author a thousand bucks per sale. If you have to wildly exaggerate to make your point, then the point isn’t compelling.

Books have a resale market. Every “lost sale” isn’t necessarily of a new purchase from a bookstore or Amazon.

Copyright has a place. Rent-seeking authors attacking LLM owners is not a sympathetic case. Said authors are demanding to have their ideas relegated to unknown backwaters. It makes the authors worse off. It makes the community poorer. Cui bono?

replies(1): >>kccqzy+hi1
◧◩◪◨
5. kccqzy+hi1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-25 02:34:24
>>gbacon+k91
We are not talking about a single sale. We are talking about millions of books.
[go to top]