zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. almost+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-23 21:04:14
So it sounds like you just go open source and let people host their own bot
replies(1): >>immibi+T
2. immibi+T[view] [source] 2025-06-23 21:08:09
>>almost+(OP)
You can already do that. People who want to do that aren't using BotGhost.
replies(1): >>nubine+l7
◧◩
3. nubine+l7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-23 21:49:19
>>immibi+T
I was under the impression that writing a third party client was against TOS, and don't you have to write a client to get your bot to interact with the server?
replies(3): >>majorc+le >>junon+z61 >>immibi+N71
◧◩◪
4. majorc+le[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-23 22:42:39
>>nubine+l7
They flip-flopped on the issue: https://0x0.st/8wYc.png
◧◩◪
5. junon+z61[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-24 09:29:12
>>nubine+l7
No. Discord has an official and formalized bot API.
◧◩◪
6. immibi+N71[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-24 09:43:10
>>nubine+l7
Well, you can do that or use the bot API, the one Discord just told BotGhost to stop using.
[go to top]