zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
5 comments
1. almost+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2025-06-23 21:04:14
So it sounds like you just go open source and let people host their own bot
replies(1):
>>immibi+T
◧
2. immibi+T
[view]
[source]
2025-06-23 21:08:09
>>almost+(OP)
You can already do that. People who want to do that aren't using BotGhost.
replies(1):
>>nubine+l7
◧◩
3. nubine+l7
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-06-23 21:49:19
>>immibi+T
I was under the impression that writing a third party client was against TOS, and don't you have to write a client to get your bot to interact with the server?
replies(3):
>>majorc+le
>>junon+z61
>>immibi+N71
◧◩◪
4. majorc+le
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-06-23 22:42:39
>>nubine+l7
They flip-flopped on the issue:
https://0x0.st/8wYc.png
◧◩◪
5. junon+z61
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-06-24 09:29:12
>>nubine+l7
No. Discord has an official and formalized bot API.
◧◩◪
6. immibi+N71
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2025-06-24 09:43:10
>>nubine+l7
Well, you can do that or use the bot API, the one Discord just told BotGhost to stop using.
[go to top]