zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. belowa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-12 13:27:59
Ready-made AOSP device trees for Pixels, which are needed to build custom ROMs, are the ones going away. This is a blow to GrapheneOS as they have been dedicating 100% of their time to improving their ROM itself in the past few years.

Since at this point they'll need to create device trees like LineageOS does with Snapdragon/MTK phones, so I hope they won't stick with the worst Android manufacturer on Earth. Especially now that the snapdragon 8 elite 2 will have the same security features as the Tensors.

replies(2): >>belowa+12 >>xnx+h7
2. belowa+12[view] [source] 2025-06-12 13:39:15
>>belowa+(OP)
Never mind, it seems like they're thinking of wasting their time with a custom ODM-built smartphone. I truly hope they won't choose this route. If they do someone should add "Will the GrapheneOS-Phone fail?" on Polymarket, I'll bet my parents' house on it.
replies(1): >>xnx+27
◧◩
3. xnx+27[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-12 14:07:34
>>belowa+12
> custom ODM-built smartphone

I agree that this would be a crazy choice and doomed to fail.

replies(1): >>112233+Rb
4. xnx+h7[view] [source] 2025-06-12 14:08:27
>>belowa+(OP)
The Pixel device trees going away is very disappointing, but he headline "AOSP project is coming to an end" is an exaggeration.
◧◩◪
5. 112233+Rb[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-12 14:34:47
>>xnx+27
could you elaborate why?
replies(1): >>NewJaz+g47
◧◩◪◨
6. NewJaz+g47[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-15 20:23:41
>>112233+Rb
They are a niche OS and not everyone who uses graphene wants their hardware. They'll have low production quantity and thus very high costs.
[go to top]