zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. th0ma5+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-07 02:13:26
The errors that LLMs make and the errors that people make are not probably not comparable enough in a lot of the discussions about LLM limitations at this point?
replies(1): >>esafak+71
2. esafak+71[view] [source] 2025-06-07 02:28:53
>>th0ma5+(OP)
We have different failure modes. And I'm sure researchers, faced with these results, will be motivated to overcome these limitations. This is all good, keep it coming. I just don't understand the some of the naysaying here.
replies(1): >>Jensso+Vn
◧◩
3. Jensso+Vn[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-07 08:50:22
>>esafak+71
They naysayers just says that even when people are motivated to solve a problem the problem might still not get solved. And there are unsolved problems still with LLM, the AI hypemen say AGI is all but a given in a few years time, but if that relies on some undiscovered breakthrough that is very unlikely since such breakthroughs are very rare.
[go to top]