zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. DaSHac+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-06 12:07:15
> when wayland has been ok for a decade now?

Looks like developers from Valve that were tasked on working on Wayland don't agree[0].

[0] >>41640420

replies(1): >>LexiMa+e01
◧
2. LexiMa+e01[view] [source] 2025-06-06 18:56:13
>>DaSHac+(OP)
Am I missing something? I don't see where it's mentioned that Valve is exhuming the corpse of X.Org.
replies(1): >>DaSHac+2M1
◧◩
3. DaSHac+2M1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-07 02:05:10
>>LexiMa+e01
The quoted text, and what I was responding to, was: "when wayland has been okay for a decade now"
replies(1): >>LexiMa+RV1
◧◩◪
4. LexiMa+RV1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-07 04:31:54
>>DaSHac+2M1
I am aware. The complete rhetorical question was:

> "why would anyone bet on X.org when wayland has been ok for a decade now?"

Valve saw problems with the Wayland protocol evolution process. Their solution was to build on top of Wayland, not exhume the corpse of X.org.

[go to top]