zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. tucker+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-05 18:36:32
It's not entirely unlike the qualified/accredited investor rules which won't let you invest in unregulated securities without income/net worth/certification requirements. No form exists which would allow someone to say "hey, I get why these wall are here, but I understand and am opting out of your protection".

I personally think there should be (I value individual rights/freedom over preventing someone from harming themselves), but I also see why we ended up here. When bad things happen, people demand action and government wants to be seen as doing something.

replies(1): >>Astral+Dj
2. Astral+Dj[view] [source] 2025-06-05 20:52:50
>>tucker+(OP)
Really, we're talking Singapore, which is one of the most restrictive places in the world.

Have the EU counterbalance this closing with extra fines for anticompetitive behavior.

[go to top]