zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. kristo+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-03 01:25:01
The AI skeptics are the ones who never develop the skill though, it's self-destructive.
replies(2): >>caycep+Le >>jvande+C81
2. caycep+Le[view] [source] 2025-06-03 04:16:44
>>kristo+(OP)
if one needs special "skill" to use AI "properly", is it truly AI?
replies(3): >>HappMa+fi >>wicked+zF >>Fillig+TR
◧◩
3. HappMa+fi[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 04:52:52
>>caycep+Le
Human labor needs skill to compose properly into any larger effort..
◧◩
4. wicked+zF[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 08:54:15
>>caycep+Le
Tesler's Theorem strikes again!
◧◩
5. Fillig+TR[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 11:04:18
>>caycep+Le
Given one needs "communications skills" to work effectively with subordinates, are subordinates truly intelligent?
replies(1): >>caycep+Dr1
6. jvande+C81[view] [source] 2025-06-03 13:11:23
>>kristo+(OP)
People treat this as some kind of all or nothing. I _do_ us LLM/AI all the time for development, but the agentic "fire and forget" model doesn't help much.

I will circle back every so often. It's not a horrible experience for greenfield work. A sort of "Start a boilerplate project that does X, but stop short of implementing A B or C". It's an assistant, then I take the work from there to make sure I know what's being built. Fine!

A combo of using web ui / cli for asking layout and doc questions + in-ide tab-complete is still better for me. The fabled 10x dev-as-ai-manager just doesn't work well yet. The responses to this complaint are usually to label one a heretic or Luddite and do the modern day workplace equivalent of "git gud", which helps absolutely nobody, and ignores that I am already quite competent at using AI for my own needs.

◧◩◪
7. caycep+Dr1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 15:01:38
>>Fillig+TR
but then, if one needs to change communications style from human to AI, does this ethos then get tossed to the wind?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/23/75

[go to top]