zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. grishk+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-03 00:44:15
But when I'm doing my job as a software developer, I don't want to be fuzzy. I want to be exact at telling the computer what to do, and for that, the most efficient way is still a programming language, not English. The only place where LLMs are an improvement is voice assistants. But voice assistants themselves are rather niche.
replies(2): >>dyausp+je >>robrya+OO
2. dyausp+je[view] [source] 2025-06-03 03:12:54
>>grishk+(OP)
I want to be fuzzy and I want the LLM to generate something exact.
replies(1): >>kennyl+Bs
◧◩
3. kennyl+Bs[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 05:53:39
>>dyausp+je
Is this sarcasm? I can’t tell anymore. Unless your ideas aren’t new, this is just impossible.
replies(1): >>dyausp+ta2
4. robrya+OO[view] [source] 2025-06-03 09:49:13
>>grishk+(OP)
It can get you 80% of the way there, you can still be exacting in telling it where it went wrong or fine tuning the result by hand.
◧◩◪
5. dyausp+ta2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 18:55:51
>>kennyl+Bs
Why? I want the LLM to understand my intent and build something exact. That already happens many times.
[go to top]