zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. lucasy+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-02 23:41:16
I’m AI neutral but the writing style here is pretty dismissive, and - to match the tone of the article - annoying as fuck.

Most completely reasonable objections to LLMs were totally dismissed.

replies(4): >>12_thr+eh >>lomase+Kb1 >>metalr+9E1 >>Anamon+INc
◧
2. 12_thr+eh[view] [source] 2025-06-03 02:23:48
>>lucasy+(OP)
Right? It's gripping reading about the author's insecurities, but fails to say anything useful about AI.
◧
3. lomase+Kb1[view] [source] 2025-06-03 12:16:34
>>lucasy+(OP)
All this smart people is dumber than me.
◧
4. metalr+9E1[view] [source] 2025-06-03 15:08:54
>>lucasy+(OP)
Seems like very common AI hype post style.

"If you aren't using this AI feature you are left behind."

I usually block people for posting like that.

◧
5. Anamon+INc[view] [source] 2025-06-08 00:55:13
>>lucasy+(OP)
Yeah, this was one of the weakest pieces of writing on GenAI that I've ever read, and I've read a lot of it.

We should flat-out dismiss the issue of licenses and copyright violations because... all developers pirate TV shows?

Seriously... what a load of crap.

[go to top]