zlacker

Looks great and excited to try this out. We’ve also had success using CodeSandbox SDK and E2B, can you share some thoughts on how you compare or future direction? Do you also use Firecracker under the hood?

>>rbitar+(OP)
I can't tell if it uses firecracker but thats my main question too. I'm curious as to whether microsandbox will be maintained and proper auditing will be done.

I welcome alternatives. It's been tough wrestling with Firecracker and OCI images. Kata container is also tough.

>>rbitar+(OP)
> can you share some thoughts on how you compare or future direction?

Microsandbox does not offer a cloud solution. It is self-hosted, designed to do what E2B does, to make it easier working with microVM-based sandboxes on your local machine whether that is Linux, macOS or Windows (planned) and to seamlessly transition to prod.

> Do you also use Firecracker under the hood?

It uses libkrun.

>>pkkkzi+Z
It will be maintained as I will be using it for some other product. And it will be audited in the future but it still early days.

>>appcyp+74
Self-hosting is definitely something we are keen to explore as most of the cloud solutions have resource constrains (ie, total active MicroVMs and/or specs per VM) and managing billing gets complicated even with hibernation features. Great project and we'll definitely take it for a spin

>>pkkkzi+Z
I wanted to try Kata containers soon. What difficulties do you have with them?