zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. bityar+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-30 16:49:11
In defense of the replies, your initial question was very vague and left people to assume you meant the obvious thing.
replies(1): >>datafl+s1
2. datafl+s1[view] [source] 2025-05-30 16:59:07
>>bityar+(OP)
Sure, that's why I clarified.
[go to top]