I'm a bit puzzled about how this reply is supposed to relate to or add to my comment. For example, I already said, "The question is, in the face of such job insecurity, why should employees care are their jobs? Their employers clearly don't care about them."
What I don't see in the reply is any kind of contextual or critical analysis. You speak as if this is simply an immutable law of nature rather than a product of our contemporary economy. "You're not supposed to take work personally." Where do you think this "principle" comes from? I agree that a lot of people say it, and indeed that it's a rational reaction to the economic circumstances. But must it be this way, and why? And if so, what do you expect to be the outcome, aside from animus and anomie? Is it a good way for us to live together, forever?
I'm slow so it took me a very long time to realize how ridiculous this was. If the company was going to lay you off, they never gave you any notice at all. You were just told not to come to work the next day.
So this is not just about current economic circumstances. It's about an imbalance of power that has been going on a long time.
Why do you think that was? Expectations don't just arise out of nothing. In 1974, there was more job security and less frequent layoffs.
> I'm slow so it took me a very long time to realize how ridiculous this was.
Alternatively, it wasn't originally ridiculous, but the economic conditions slowly changed to make it ridiculous.
> It's about an imbalance of power that has been going on a long time.
Of course things didn't change overnight. I never said they did.