zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. KnuthI+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-27 07:03:18
Looks and reads like LLM dreck.

Perhaps it is time to have rules about the submission of AI generated trash to HN as faux-articles.

replies(3): >>getnor+ra >>postex+HA >>Cthulh+ZJ
2. getnor+ra[view] [source] 2025-05-27 09:14:30
>>KnuthI+(OP)
I don't think it's entirely AI-generated. The review selects details and explains them logically, e.g. why GE was able to financialize itself. AI slop doesn't have logic, it just treats the text as a bag of words and vaguely gestures at the overall vibe.

On the other hand, the Key Quotes are not really that key, and some of the bullet points don't really work (it's not clear how the LTC insurance time bomb can be considered an accounting trick).

3. postex+HA[view] [source] 2025-05-27 13:35:21
>>KnuthI+(OP)
That's my feeling as well. Nowadays it's getting harder to differentiate between LLM "dreck" and genuine bad writing that feels like personal notes of some uninitiated reader.
4. Cthulh+ZJ[view] [source] 2025-05-27 14:41:04
>>KnuthI+(OP)
What is the difference between AI generated and paid-per-word fiverrr writers? Because the bar is on the floor when it comes to writing sometimes.
[go to top]