zlacker

> This is a baby 4 year old leap in technology, why are people expecting it to be mature?

Because its fans act as though it is, and this article is a response to that overly-enthusiastic outlook on what the tool can do.

>>bigstr+(OP)
I don't think people are "acting" like its mature. It's extremely useful to many (myself included). And it's nonsensical for people to claim it's not useful simply because they haven't found the use.

>>khazho+T3
This pretty much sums it up. I have found it to be incredibly useful. Others might have not, but then again, you have to approach it the right way. Feed it context, be as specific as possible, and do not expect 100% accuracy. I once a fed a conversation to ChatGPT and it missed something that I had to point out. The fact that it missed something does not make me go: "AI sucks", it is just simply not perfect, and it still can be very useful. I had better experiences with Claude than ChatGPT anyways.