zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. candid+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-21 12:45:20
Are LLM contributions effectively under public domain?
replies(2): >>ben-sc+Q5 >>Quarre+Jk
2. ben-sc+Q5[view] [source] 2025-05-21 13:30:22
>>candid+(OP)
IANAL. It's my understanding that this hasn't been determined yet. It could be under public domain, under the rights of everyone whose creations were used to train the AI or anywhere in-between.

We do know that LLMs will happily reproduce something from their training set and that is a clear copyright violation. So it can't be that everything they produce is public domain.

3. Quarre+Jk[view] [source] 2025-05-21 14:58:26
>>candid+(OP)
This is my understanding, at least in US law.

I can't remember the specific case now, but it has been ruled in the past, that you need human-novelty, and there was a case recently that confirmed this that involved LLMs.

[go to top]