zlacker

So, to achieve parity, they should allow humans to also commit code without checking that it at least compiles, right?

Or MS already does that?

>>nottor+(OP)
the code goes through a PR review process like any other? what are you talking about?

>>codyvo+Z4
i don't know about you, but i would never EVER submit a PR that fails to compile. not tests are failing, those happen (specially flaky ci), but not compiling.

that's literally the bare minimum.

>>fernan+q6
and you think this beta system that launched like 2 days ago can’t achieve that?

it also opens the PR as its working session. there are a lot of dials, and a lot of redditor-ass opinions from people who don’t use or understand the tech

>>codyvo+Z4
so do you consider normal to submit code that you have never compiled? or ran at least once if it's not a compiled language...

>>codyvo+T8
what i see is a human telling the "AI" that the code does not compile

what use is a bot if it can't do at least this simple step?

>>nottor+mq
it can do this step. once again, this launched 2 days ago and people are using it for the first time

if you have used it for more than a few hours (or literally just read the docs) and aren’t stupid, you know this is easily solved

you’re giving into mob mentality

>>codyvo+0s
So everyone who doesn't worship "AI" is stupid? :)

>>nottor+uC
is that what I said? if you can’t read documentation and follow basic instructions to get a tool to work you’re stupid. you asked a snarky question like it’s some gotcha. once again, if you actually use the tool and read the docs and can’t figure it out, I think it’s a skill issue

>>codyvo+ZK
The gotcha is you seem to consider it normal to push code that doesn't qualify even for "it works on my machine".