zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. handfu+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-13 21:50:17
Perhaps a hedge in case apocalyptic scenarios disable or reduce networks on the ground?
replies(2): >>jshear+a1 >>arp242+d2
2. jshear+a1[view] [source] 2025-05-13 21:58:47
>>handfu+(OP)
Apocalyptic scenarios where terrestrial communication methods going back over a century are no longer feasible, but we can still readily talk to space? And maintain/replace the stuff we have up there?
replies(1): >>handfu+HC
3. arp242+d2[view] [source] 2025-05-13 22:07:30
>>handfu+(OP)
Yes, because in an apocalyptic scenario what we all will be clamouring will be space data centres training AI and mining bitcoin.
replies(1): >>handfu+EC
◧◩
4. handfu+EC[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-14 03:43:13
>>arp242+d2
We? Did you think they're hedging so you could use it?
◧◩
5. handfu+HC[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-14 03:44:21
>>jshear+a1
Like the commenter, your error is thinking the hedge is for you. And what's more—you're assuming the scenario must be total destruction, there's a gradation of disruption where this hedge remains feasible and even vital.
replies(1): >>handfu+eX
◧◩◪
6. handfu+eX[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-14 07:26:56
>>handfu+HC
Like [the other commenter]*
[go to top]