zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Mirast+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-13 14:54:39
That's sad news. ChromeOS is much faster and more efficient than Android. Turning off the Android subsystem in low-end Chromebooks is a huge performance boost, even when no Android apps are open.
replies(2): >>odo124+y1 >>refulg+aN
2. odo124+y1[view] [source] 2025-05-13 15:03:00
>>Mirast+(OP)
To be fair, that’s likely because the Android subsystem is a virtual machine - not running multiple sets of system services / CPU emulation on a computer will make it faster pretty much universally.
replies(2): >>nashas+n2 >>Mirast+ni
◧◩
3. nashas+n2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-13 15:08:48
>>odo124+y1
Yup, the android vm is too much for a chrome pc unless it’s a high end device.

I can’t imagine android going faster than chrome at a native level either.

◧◩
4. Mirast+ni[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-13 16:36:37
>>odo124+y1
It's not just the virtualization, ChromeOS has had a lot of work put into performance. The low-end ARM Chromebooks use the same hardware as budget Android devices, and they're noticeably faster. My Android phone uses more RAM doing nothing from a fresh boot than those Chromebooks even have.
replies(1): >>odo124+732
5. refulg+aN[view] [source] 2025-05-13 19:30:13
>>Mirast+(OP)
Breaks my heart (worked on Android from 2016-2023, ChromeOS was a revelation. Alas, Efficiency™. (as in salaries, not the things we build))
◧◩◪
6. odo124+732[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-14 06:35:34
>>Mirast+ni
That’s a good point actually. Windowed app performance on Android apps is especially bad since they’re not designed for it (most of my experience is on Android-x86, but window resizing performance is not great)
[go to top]