zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. pc86+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-07 14:01:50
That's a really interesting thought, I'd love to get involved in software PE/M&A on the technical analysis side but I don't have the academic pedigree for it (it seems every shop that does this work is 90% Ivy and Ivy-adjacent universities and FAANG-level work history).

So if I'm understanding your point then part of the value in paying $3B for Windsurf is that it acts as a pricing anchor on future raises (and presumably acquisitions as well) for competing products? So Cursor is less likely to raise at a $30B valuation if Windsurf is 95% as good and just sold for 1/10 that.

replies(2): >>whatsh+YL >>dayjah+8P1
2. whatsh+YL[view] [source] 2025-05-07 18:01:14
>>pc86+(OP)
The insanity of it all is that these companies are worth about $3M.
3. dayjah+8P1[view] [source] 2025-05-08 03:33:46
>>pc86+(OP)
You have superbly summarized the point I was trying to make regarding valuations.

Regarding your other point about pedigree: I’ve a high school level education. I was considered senior at this specific co. as I had played an important role in building the product (I’m a “classic case” of self taught generalist). I’m not at all clear on how I was selected to take part in that effort to be frank. It was fun.

[go to top]