zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. _1tem+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-07 08:23:51
> If jetbrains can combine there IDE technology with cursor technology, that would be ideal.

Just give them some time, they're not stupid. I'd drop Cursor in an instant once JetBrains catches up, because IntelliJ IDEs are just a way more powerful.

replies(2): >>sumedh+ki >>nhumri+Lp
2. sumedh+ki[view] [source] 2025-05-07 11:50:00
>>_1tem+(OP)
Didnt Jetbrains launch their AI last year, is anyone using it?
replies(1): >>leonid+YT
3. nhumri+Lp[view] [source] 2025-05-07 12:47:26
>>_1tem+(OP)
Try out Junie
◧◩
4. leonid+YT[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-07 15:16:04
>>sumedh+ki
They're giving out 1 month free if you're paying for their IDEs already. I've tried it last year and it was very limited, not "agentic". Now they've launched an agentic version called Junie and also gave another 1 month free, and I've tried it again.

It's a nice improvement over the last edition, but still quite not "smart" as Cursor or Windsurf. The agent seems too shortsighted compared to competitors: it may stop looking for files or making edits sooner and you're left with code made with incomplete context (that does not work or just doesn't address your needs). It also does not fix linter/compiler errors from its own output code before finishing, unlike Cursor.

[go to top]