zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. bluebo+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-06 20:27:28
OpenAI needs a product team

hiring is hard

it's a high-functioning team swimming in contemporary design and eng practices

code is emerging as an important battleground

OpenAI has the $$$

replies(2): >>owebma+Wi >>buffer+XH
2. owebma+Wi[view] [source] 2025-05-06 22:52:15
>>bluebo+(OP)
It is ironic that the company said to be cooking AGI is acquihiring software engineers because they can't develop it in-house.
3. buffer+XH[view] [source] 2025-05-07 03:36:29
>>bluebo+(OP)
I bet they can hire best minds in the world for a fraction of $3 billion.
replies(2): >>johnta+oQ >>rainco+wU
◧◩
4. johnta+oQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-07 05:36:48
>>buffer+XH
If that's so, then why is Codex such an inferior product to Claude Code? And why haven't they already built an code editor or at least VS Code extension yet?
◧◩
5. rainco+wU[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-07 06:30:00
>>buffer+XH
JetBrains has been making IDE for a decade. They were the only company that actually made money by selling IDE. So I assume they have the best programmers who understand IDE.

However they fail to make a Cursor competitor so far. This alone suggests it's a harder task than meets the eye.

replies(1): >>conart+VX
◧◩◪
6. conart+VX[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-07 07:16:53
>>rainco+wU
It is, but you are assuming that only a well known IDE team would do it. To me JetBrains is the least likely to be an innovator here because they depend on their reputation for being a mature technology.

Someone like me isn't known at all but it means I have been able to experiment for a long time without pressure, which is how you do real innovation.

JetBrains as a company probably owns 10 million lines of code and it's just really hard to move fast when you're tugging that kind of ball and chain

[go to top]